Bar Council of India Notice

Disclaimer & Confirmation

As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, an advocate is not permitted to solicit work or advertise. By clicking “I Agree” below, you acknowledge and confirm that:

you are seeking information about Advocate Manish Jha of your own accord and for your own information and use; there has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any kind whatsoever from Advocate Manish Jha or the chamber to solicit any work through this website; the information made available here is provided only on your specific request; and no information on this website is to be construed as legal advice, nor does its use create any advocate-client relationship.

⚖  E-397, 4th Floor, Tagore Garden Extension, New Delhi – 110027 Mon–Sat  ·  +91 98738 50301  ·  legal@advocatemanishjha.com
Advocate Manish Jha Criminal · Civil · Family Law — New Delhi ☎  Consult the Chamber
Home › Supreme Court — Matrimonial Settlement
Supreme Court · 28 September 2026

One Order, Every Case: How Matrimonial Litigation Bundles End at the Supreme Court

In Shikha v. State of Odisha, 2026 INSC 1060, a Bench of Justices B.V. Nagarathna and R. Mahadevan gave effect to a settlement between estranged spouses, directing payment of Rs. 35,00,000 as permanent alimony in full and final settlement — with the husband’s application under Article 142 seeking divorce on irretrievable breakdown and closure of all pending cases.

By the time a broken marriage reaches the Supreme Court, it rarely travels alone. Criminal cases, maintenance petitions, matrimonial proceedings and their appeals accumulate across jurisdictions. The Court’s answer, increasingly, is comprehensive disposal: a negotiated settlement recorded in one order that fixes permanent alimony and closes the entire bundle. A decision of 28 September 2026 shows the mechanics — including how the Court calibrates the amount.

The anatomy of a bundled settlement

The parties married on 4 December 2016 and lived apart from 2022. Litigation multiplied — criminal and civil, involving the spouses and family members, spread across courts. The matter reached the Supreme Court through the criminal side, and the husband filed an interlocutory application invoking Article 142: dissolve the marriage on irretrievable breakdown, and quash everything pending between the families. Mediation of such disputes at the Court is standard, and here the parties ultimately agreed to a mutual settlement.

What the Bench directed

The money term

Rs. 35,00,000 as permanent alimony in full and final settlement of the wife’s claims — structured as Rs. 2,00,000 paid immediately with the balance Rs. 33,00,000 by demand drafts.

The calibration

The figure was not plucked from the air: the order records the wife’s medical condition and the husband’s financial capacity as the anchors of the assessment — the two variables that matter most in alimony practice.

The closure

The settlement operated as a package resolving the litigation between the parties, in line with the Court’s established practice of comprehensive disposal in matrimonial bundles under Article 142.

Why parties settle at this level

Without settlementWith a Supreme Court settlement
Each case proceeds separately — years of hearings in multiple courtsOne order addresses the full bundle
Maintenance orders remain open to revision and enforcement battlesA lump-sum figure, paid in verifiable tranches, ends the money disputes
Criminal cases continue regardless of the civil outcomeQuashing on settlement is sought within the same framework
No court below can act on irretrievable breakdownArticle 142 uniquely permits dissolution on that ground

A caution from adjacent practice: settlements cannot bind statutory authorities who are not parties — tax proceedings, for instance, stand outside the package unless the authority itself is before the Court. Draft the settlement’s scope accordingly.

Structuring the deal: counsel’s checklist

List every proceeding. The settlement schedule should identify each case by number and forum — anything omitted survives.
Stage the payments. Immediate part-payment plus demand drafts at recorded milestones, as here, protects both sides and gives the Court a compliance framework.
Address health and capacity on record. Medical circumstances and income material justify the figure — and guard the order against later challenge.
Provide for default. Revival clauses and enforcement mechanisms make the “full and final” language mean what it says.

For litigants exhausted by multi-forum matrimonial war, this order is the map: mediation, a calibrated lump sum, tranche payments, and comprehensive closure — with Article 142 supplying the jurisdiction that no other court possesses.

This article is for general information only and is not legal advice. Settlement value and structure depend entirely on the parties’ circumstances; parties should obtain advice on their own matter.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was pending between the parties?

Married in December 2016 and separated since 2022, the spouses and their families were locked in multiple criminal and civil proceedings across jurisdictions. The husband applied under Article 142 seeking divorce on the ground of irretrievable breakdown and quashing of the pending litigation; the parties then agreed to settle.

What did the Supreme Court order on money?

Permanent alimony of Rs. 35,00,000 in full and final settlement, payable in two tranches — Rs. 2,00,000 immediately and Rs. 33,00,000 by demand drafts. The Court took into account the wife’s medical condition and the husband’s financial capacity in fixing the figure.

Can the Supreme Court dissolve a marriage on irretrievable breakdown?

Yes. Under Article 142 of the Constitution, the Supreme Court — and only the Supreme Court — may dissolve a marriage on irretrievable breakdown to do complete justice, a power a Constitution Bench has affirmed. Relief on that ground is discretionary, and settlements are the commonest vehicle through which it is exercised.

How is permanent alimony assessed?

There is no formula. Courts weigh the length of the marriage, the parties’ incomes and capacities, the standard of living, health — as the wife’s medical condition did here — and the closure value of settling every proceeding at once.

Note: This article is general information about the law and is not legal advice. It does not create an advocate-client relationship. The position stated is as at 29 September 2026 and may have changed since. Readers should verify any provision or decision referred to against the official text and seek advice on their own circumstances.