Bar Council of India Notice

Disclaimer & Confirmation

As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, an advocate is not permitted to solicit work or advertise. By clicking “I Agree” below, you acknowledge and confirm that:

you are seeking information about Advocate Manish Jha of your own accord and for your own information and use; there has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any kind whatsoever from Advocate Manish Jha or the chamber to solicit any work through this website; the information made available here is provided only on your specific request; and no information on this website is to be construed as legal advice, nor does its use create any advocate-client relationship.

⚖  E-397, 4th Floor, Tagore Garden Extension, New Delhi – 110027 Mon–Sat  ·  +91 98738 50301  ·  legal@advocatemanishjha.com
Advocate Manish Jha Criminal · Civil · Family Law — New Delhi ☎  Consult the Chamber
Home › Appeals: Summary Dismissal
Practice Explainer · Criminal Appeals

Dismissed at the Threshold: Summary Dismissal of Criminal Appeals under Section 425 BNSS

Not every criminal appeal reaches a full hearing. Section 425 BNSS (384 CrPC) permits summary dismissal where there is no sufficient ground to interfere — but hedges the power with safeguards that every appellant should know.

☎  Speak to the Chamber Chamber & Location

The first hearing of a criminal appeal is not a formality. Under Section 425 of the BNSS (Section 384 CrPC), the appellate court that receives a petition of appeal may dismiss it summarily if, on examining the petition and the judgment under challenge, it finds no sufficient ground for interfering. The power exists to filter out hopeless appeals — but Parliament fenced it with safeguards: a hearing before dismissal, recorded reasons in the subordinate appellate courts, and the ability to call for the record first. Understanding this stage explains why admission-day advocacy matters so much.

Where the power sits in the appellate scheme

A criminal appeal begins with a petition of appeal accompanied by the judgment under Section 423 BNSS (382 CrPC), or through the jail route under Section 424 BNSS (383 CrPC) for appellants in custody. Section 425 then interposes a judicial filter: the appellate court examines the petition and the judgment and asks a single question — is there sufficient ground for interfering? If the answer is plainly no, the court may dismiss the appeal summarily, saving the parties and the system a full hearing that could only end one way.

The safeguards built into the section

A hearing first. An appeal presented in the ordinary course is not dismissed summarily unless the appellant or counsel has had a reasonable opportunity of being heard in support of it. The threshold decision is made after argument, however brief.
Jail appeals protected. An appellant who has appealed from jail is likewise entitled to an opportunity of being heard, except where the court considers the appeal frivolous — a deliberately narrow exception.
Reasons on the record. Where a court other than the High Court dismisses an appeal summarily, it must record its reasons. A one-line rejection by a Sessions Court invites interference on that ground alone.
The record can be called. Before deciding, the court may send for the trial record. Where the petition raises any arguable point on the evidence, the sounder course — and the usual one — is to call for the record and admit the appeal.

Summary dismissal versus the other endings

Summary dismissal. A merits decision at the threshold: the court has read the petition and judgment, heard the appellant, and concluded that no sufficient ground exists. It ends the appeal, subject to challenge before the higher forum.
→
Dismissal after full hearing. The appeal is admitted, the record called, the State heard under the later provisions of the chapter, and the appeal decided by a reasoned judgment under Section 427 BNSS (386 CrPC) after complete argument.

A third category does not lawfully exist: dismissal for default. Criminal appeals are not subject to the civil discipline of non-prosecution. Courts have repeatedly held that an appeal against conviction cannot be dismissed merely because the appellant or counsel is absent; the court must decide it on the merits, if necessary after appointing amicus curiae. An order styled as a dismissal for non-prosecution in a criminal appeal is a recognised irregularity.

Why admission-stage advocacy decides cases

The summary-dismissal stage compresses the whole appeal into minutes. What the judge has is the petition of appeal and the judgment; what the judge is looking for is one arguable reason to call for the record. The drafting consequence is direct: grounds of appeal should lead with the strongest, most concrete infirmity — a contradiction on a material particular, a reliance on inadmissible material, a sentencing error — rather than boilerplate about the judgment being “bad in law and on facts”. At the hearing, counsel’s task is not to win the appeal but to cross the modest threshold of “sufficient ground for interfering”.

Annex a legible copy of the judgment and, where available, the material depositions the grounds rely upon — the judge can only act on what is before the court.

Open with the single best point, stated as a specific error with a page reference, not as a conclusion.

Where the appellant is in custody, couple the admission argument with the application for suspension of sentence or bail, since both turn on the same arguable points.

If the court is unpersuaded, seek a short date to place the record rather than accept dismissal on an incomplete file.

Section 425 BNSS is the gate through which every criminal appeal must pass, and most pass it easily — the power is used against appeals that disclose nothing arguable, not against appeals that are merely difficult. The practical lesson is to treat the first listing as a real hearing: a well-drafted petition and ten focused minutes of argument are usually all that separates admission from a summary end.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does summary dismissal of an appeal mean?

It means the appellate court, after perusing the petition of appeal and the copy of the judgment, dismisses the appeal at the threshold because it sees no sufficient ground to interfere — without issuing notice to the State or conducting a full merits hearing with the record. It is a judicial decision on the appeal itself, not a procedural lapse.

Can an appeal be dismissed summarily without hearing the appellant?

The scheme of Section 425 BNSS requires that an appellant who has presented an appeal through counsel has a reasonable opportunity of being heard before summary dismissal. For jail appeals, the court must likewise give the appellant an opportunity of being heard unless it considers the appeal frivolous. Dismissal without that opportunity is vulnerable to challenge.

Can a criminal appeal be dismissed because the lawyer did not appear?

Criminal appeals are not dismissed for default or non-prosecution; courts have consistently held that an appeal against conviction must be decided on its merits. Where counsel is absent, the proper course is to adjourn or to appoint amicus curiae — not to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

What remedies survive a summary dismissal?

The order can be challenged before the higher court in the judicial hierarchy, and in appropriate cases the absence of recorded reasons or of a hearing is itself a ground. Whether any restoration or recall lies before the same court depends on the nature of the defect, so the order should be assessed by counsel immediately, while limitation for the next forum runs.

Note: This article is general information about the law and is not legal advice. It does not create an advocate-client relationship. The position stated is as at 14 November 2026 and may have changed since. Readers should verify any provision or decision referred to against the official text and seek advice on their own circumstances.