Bar Council of India Notice

Disclaimer & Confirmation

As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, an advocate is not permitted to solicit work or advertise. By clicking “I Agree” below, you acknowledge and confirm that:

you are seeking information about Advocate Manish Jha of your own accord and for your own information and use; there has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any kind whatsoever from Advocate Manish Jha or the chamber to solicit any work through this website; the information made available here is provided only on your specific request; and no information on this website is to be construed as legal advice, nor does its use create any advocate-client relationship.

⚖  E-397, 4th Floor, Tagore Garden Extension, New Delhi – 110027 Mon–Sat  ·  +91 98738 50301  ·  legal@advocatemanishjha.com
Advocate Manish Jha Criminal · Civil · Family Law — New Delhi ☎  Consult the Chamber
Home › Articles & Updates
From the Chamber

Articles & Legal Updates

Notes on procedure and practice before the Delhi courts, written for people trying to understand a proceeding they are already in.

These notes are written for litigants and for younger members of the Bar. They explain procedure as it operates in the Delhi courts — the sequence of steps, the timelines that matter, and the points at which a matter is commonly lost. They are general information, not advice on any particular case.

All articles (537) Civil & Property (32) Commercial (1) Commercial & Corporate (126) Criminal Law (184) Cyber & Fraud (3) Matrimonial & Family (133) Procedure & Practice (58)
15 August 2026 · Matrimonial & Family

Child Custody in Delhi Family Courts – Advocate Manish Jha

A practice guide to guardianship and custody petitions in the Delhi Family Courts: statutes, jurisdiction, interim visitation, counselling and mediation, evidence, final orders and appeals.

Read →
14 August 2026 · Criminal Law

NDPS Bail: Two Delhi HC Orders – Advocate Manish Jha

On 12 August 2026 the Delhi High Court granted bail in two NDPS cases from the same investigation — one because call records and co-accused disclosures alone could not establish complicity, the other because custody of almost five years with 8 of 22 witnesses examined violated the right to a speedy trial.

Read →
14 August 2026 · Criminal Law

Notice Before Arrest: Delhi HC – Advocate Manish Jha

Where the accused had joined the investigation and the IO saw no present need to arrest, the Delhi High Court disposed of an anticipatory bail plea by directing two weeks' prior notice before any arrest, preserving recourse to the Sessions Court.

Read →
14 August 2026 · Commercial & Corporate

Section 34 Is Not an Appeal: DHC – Advocate Manish Jha

Dismissing the Union of India's challenge to an award that quashed a Rs 8.55 crore telecom demand against Sterlite Technologies, the Delhi High Court restated that a plausible arbitral view cannot be substituted under Section 34.

Read →
14 August 2026 · Civil & Property

Transfer of a Suit for Bias: DHC – Advocate Manish Jha

The Delhi High Court dismissed a Section 24 CPC petition to transfer a commercial suit, holding that oral observations during hearings, without any adverse adjudication, cannot establish bias — and imposed Rs 25,000 costs.

Read →
14 August 2026 · Matrimonial & Family

How a DV Case Proceeds in Delhi – Advocate Manish Jha

The Section 12 application, the Domestic Incident Report, ex parte interim orders and the five reliefs — how a case under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 moves through the Delhi Magistrate Courts.

Read →
13 August 2026 · Criminal Law

Alibi and Quashing an FIR: Supreme Court – Advocate Manish Jha

In Rahul v. State of Uttar Pradesh, 2026 INSC 825, the Supreme Court quashed a dowry death prosecution on the strength of BSF service records, holding there is no inflexible rule that an alibi can be proved only at trial.

Read →
13 August 2026 · Procedure & Practice

One Appeal for Suit and Counterclaim: SC – Advocate Manish Jha

In Basudev v. Sanjay Kumar, 2026 INSC 831, the Supreme Court holds that a common judgment deciding a suit and a counterclaim can be challenged in one composite appeal, framed and court-fee stamped as two.

Read →
13 August 2026 · Commercial & Corporate

Section 9 Relief After an Award: SC – Advocate Manish Jha

In NPCC v. Ishvakoo, 2026 INSC 828, the Supreme Court holds that even the party which lost the arbitration may obtain interim protection under Section 9 in rare and compelling cases, upholding a Rs 3.5 crore deposit.

Read →
13 August 2026 · Matrimonial & Family

Mutual Consent Divorce in Delhi Courts – Advocate Manish Jha

The joint petition, the first and second motions, the six-month period and when it can be waived — how a mutual consent divorce actually proceeds in the Family Courts of Delhi.

Read →
11 August 2026 · Criminal Law

PMLA Bail After a Compromise: Delhi HC – Advocate Manish Jha

On 10 August 2026 the Delhi High Court refused bail in a money laundering case, holding that a compromise in the predicate offence does not erase PMLA proceedings and applying the Section 45 twin conditions.

Read →
11 August 2026 · Criminal Law

Acquittal Reversed Under S.354A: Delhi HC – Advocate Manish Jha

The Delhi High Court reversed a 2016 acquittal, convicting under Section 354A IPC while holding POCSO inapplicable for want of proof of age — with directions on dignity in cross-examination.

Read →
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 537 articles

What Is Covered Here

The chamber writes on the areas in which it appears: criminal procedure under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, bail practice, matrimonial and family proceedings before the Delhi Family Courts, cheque dishonour and recovery, and proceedings before the NCLT and the Motor Accident Claims Tribunals. Notes on reported judgments of the Supreme Court of India and the High Court of Delhi are published with a link to the official text of the decision, so that a reader can verify the position rather than rely on a summary.

No article on this page identifies a client or discusses a pending matter conducted by the chamber. Where a statutory provision is cited, the section number is given so that a reader can verify it against the bare Act.

If a subject you need is not covered here, the chamber can be written to at legal@advocatemanishjha.com. Questions of general interest are taken up as future notes; the chamber does not give advice on individual matters by email.