Bar Council of India Notice

Disclaimer & Confirmation

As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, an advocate is not permitted to solicit work or advertise. By clicking “I Agree” below, you acknowledge and confirm that:

you are seeking information about Advocate Manish Jha of your own accord and for your own information and use; there has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any kind whatsoever from Advocate Manish Jha or the chamber to solicit any work through this website; the information made available here is provided only on your specific request; and no information on this website is to be construed as legal advice, nor does its use create any advocate-client relationship.

⚖  E-397, 4th Floor, Tagore Garden Extension, New Delhi – 110027 Mon–Sat  ·  +91 98738 50301  ·  legal@advocatemanishjha.com
Advocate Manish Jha Criminal · Civil · Family Law — New Delhi ☎  Consult the Chamber
Home › Charge for Maintenance
Explainer · Matrimonial & Family

Securing Maintenance Against Property: Charges, Security and Attachment

A monthly order is only as good as its enforcement. The law offers ways to anchor maintenance to immovable property so the obligation survives evasion — and even transfer.

Maintenance orders fail most often not because the amount is wrong but because collection is hard: the payer changes jobs, hides income, or simply stops paying. One of the least-used answers in the statute book is to tie the obligation to property. The Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 (HAMA) and the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (HMA) both allow maintenance to be secured by a charge on immovable property, and the execution machinery of the civil and criminal codes allows arrears to be recovered from property in any event. This article maps those tools.

Why anchor maintenance to property

Income can be concealed; property is harder to hide. A salaried payer can resign, a businessman can show losses, but a flat, a shop or agricultural land stays on the record. Securing maintenance against property serves three distinct ends: it guarantees a fund for future instalments, it deters evasion because default puts the asset itself at risk, and — where a charge is created and noticed — it survives a transfer of the property to third parties.

The statutory tools, side by side

ProvisionWho it helpsWhat it does
Section 25, Hindu Marriage Act, 1955Spouse awarded permanent alimony in matrimonial proceedingsPermits the court to secure the gross or periodical payment, if necessary, by a charge on the respondent's immovable property.
Section 27, HAMA 1956Dependants claiming maintenance from a deceased Hindu's estateDeclares that the claim is not a charge on the estate unless created by will, decree, agreement "or otherwise" — so the charge must be sought and created.
Section 28, HAMA 1956Dependants whose source-estate is transferredLets the right be enforced against a transferee with notice of the right, or a gratuitous transferee; a bona fide purchaser for value without notice takes free.
Section 39, Transfer of Property Act, 1882Any person with a right to maintenance from the profits of immovable propertyMirrors the HAMA rule for transfers generally: the right follows the property into the hands of transferees with notice and gratuitous transferees.
Order XXI, CPC / fine-recovery machinery under the BNSSAny holder of a maintenance decree or order in arrearsAttachment and sale of the defaulter's property to realise arrears, independent of any charge.

Getting a charge created in practice

Identify the property early — plead the respondent's immovable assets in the petition and the income affidavit stage, with particulars.
Ask for security expressly — a prayer under Section 25 HMA (or in a HAMA suit) that the amount be secured by a charge on identified property; courts rarely grant what is not sought.
Justify the necessity — a record of defaults, concealment of income, attempts to alienate assets or departure abroad is what persuades a court that a bare money order will not do.
Perfect the charge — have the decree spell out the property with full description, and place the charge on the public record so later purchasers have notice.
Guard against alienation — where a sale is threatened mid-proceeding, seek interim restraint; a transfer to defeat a maintenance claim invites scrutiny, and transferees with notice take subject to the right.

Charge versus attachment: two different shields

Attachment in execution

Available to every order-holder once arrears accrue. It reaches property the defaulter owns at that time, but gives no priority before default and no protection if the asset was sold earlier.

→

Charge created by decree

Created before default, it earmarks a specific property for the maintenance obligation, binds gratuitous transferees and purchasers with notice, and makes the asset a continuing security for future instalments — not only past arrears.

Points the paying side should know

  • A charge is not automatic and is not punitive: courts weigh necessity, and an honest payment record is the best argument against security.
  • A bona fide purchaser for value without notice of the maintenance right is protected; diligence in title searches cuts both ways.
  • Security under Section 25 HMA can be varied — like the alimony itself — on a change of circumstances, through the statutory variation machinery.
  • Consensual security (a registered agreement charging property or a fixed deposit under lien) is often the cleanest settlement term in mutual consent divorces, and courts routinely act on such undertakings.

This article explains the statutory framework in general terms. Whether a charge or security is appropriate in a given case depends on its facts; this is not legal advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is maintenance automatically a charge on the husband's property?

No. Section 27 of HAMA states the dependant's claim is not a charge on the estate of the deceased or any portion of it unless one has been created — by the will of the deceased, by a decree of court, by agreement between the parties, or otherwise. The claimant must therefore ask the court to create the charge, or secure it by agreement; it does not arise by operation of law.

Can a court order permanent alimony to be secured on property?

Yes. Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act empowers the court granting permanent alimony to order payment of a gross sum or periodical sums for a term not exceeding the claimant's life, and expressly permits the payment to be secured, if necessary, by a charge on the respondent's immovable property. The court weighs the parties' income, property, conduct and circumstances when deciding whether security is warranted.

What happens if the property is sold after a charge is created?

Under Section 28 of HAMA, where a dependant has a right to receive maintenance out of an estate and the estate or part of it is transferred, the right can be enforced against the transferee if the transferee has notice of the right, or if the transfer is gratuitous — but not against a transferee for consideration without notice. Registering the charge and placing the order on the public record is therefore critical protection.

Can arrears of maintenance be recovered from property even without a charge?

Yes. Arrears under a Family Court or magistrate's order can be recovered through the fine-recovery machinery, which includes attachment and sale of movable and immovable property, and a decree-holder under a civil decree for maintenance can levy execution against the judgment-debtor's property under Order XXI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. A charge adds priority and follows the property; execution reaches whatever the defaulter owns when arrears accrue.

Note: This article is general information about the law and is not legal advice. It does not create an advocate-client relationship. The position stated is as at 20 October 2026 and may have changed since. Readers should verify any provision or decision referred to against the official text and seek advice on their own circumstances.